Re: Inline's and preprocessor

• Previous message: Jim H: "Re: How do I cancel overlapped WaitCommEvent calls?"
• In reply to: Jacky Luk: "Re: Inline's and preprocessor"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]

Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:19:10 -0400

"Jacky Luk" <jl@knight.com> wrote in message
news:umqg27nZEHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Is it possible to "project" that part of code out?
> I'm building a disassembler. I can not determine when inline code was used
> but on the other hand seize the source code in the headers of the compiler
> set....
> How do you "attempt" to compile the inline code so that the equivlents can
> be used by FLIRT. If it's not possible, I have to name the routines as
> unnamed_library_routine etc... Any insights?

    Basically, you can't. I suppose, assuming you have the source, that you
could build a table of inlined functions and do a brute force search for the
appropriate definition, but it really doesn't sound like a realistic
approach. Especially since you don't know what the compiler might choose to
optimize into an inlined function.

-- 
-GJC [MS Windows SDK MVP]
-Software Consultant (Embedded systems and Real Time Controls)
- http://www.mvps.org/ArcaneIncantations/consulting.htm
-gchanson@mvps.org

• Previous message: Jim H: "Re: How do I cancel overlapped WaitCommEvent calls?"
• In reply to: Jacky Luk: "Re: Inline's and preprocessor"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]