Re: XP Update causes product faults - DLLCache??

From: hector (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 06/13/04 

Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:16:43 -0400

Thanks Phil for your input.

Don't know. Unfortunately, I was not able to get a dr.watson log from the
customer (he sent it to Microsoft instead). I am going to see if it is still
in his system32 directory.

As I noted to Ivan, DLLCACHE is only mentioned here because that is what
Microsoft first told the customer to do (restore it). So based on that
recommendation, I can only assume the "possibility" of a new known issue
with the XP update, enough for MS to justify the suggestion to the customer.

But this did not work for the customer (he wasn't sure if he did it right)
so he restored to his previous day backup and is now back in operation.
That doesn't help none of us. :-) If DLLCACHE is the culprit, I need to
find out what is it about this backend OS hidden transparent "'should not
change anything" concept that our Win32 system doesn't like or has a
problem with. We do no kludging except a ODBC wrapper pre-load which was
disabled by default nearly 2 years ago.

Thanks 

-- 
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
"Phil Wilson" <pdjwilson@nospam.cox.net> wrote in message
news:Ok74V0WUEHA.3332@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I'm pretty sure WFP writes an event log entry when SFC restores a file to
> the correct version from the Dll Cache. Anything there?
>
> -- 
> Phil Wilson
> [MVP Windows Installer]

Relevant Pages

  • Re: XP Update causes product faults - DLLCache??
    ... > and if the problem continues, send the Windows captured GPF report to us> instead of Microsoft as he was previously instructed by Microsoft's new> "automated GPF submission" popup. ... So> if since you must get your system back into production, restore the OS back> to Monday's conditions until we find out what's going on because right now,> we don't have a clue and we have no other similar customer report> as of yet to go by." ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: A place where non-mention of VMS is good !
    ... Microsoft, I have many problems with what they have done to computing. ... community forum site run by two of the principals from Winternals. ... information about the internals of the Windows operating system. ... Microsoft is meeting all standard customer and partner commitments ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: What is the maximal length of usernames on Solaris?
    ... >Because you seem to argue that a supplier like Microsoft ... discussing the wants of the customer. ... >> the reason manufacturers are making phone with these capabilities is ... back in the 1980ies MS-DOS was easily the most loathed OS. ...
    (comp.sys.sun.admin)
  • Re: Template open/save behavior
    ... The distinction you refer to is made by the "Legal" industry. ... single customer) then there was no wiggle room at all. ... Anything else is a bug, ... In the case that began this discussion: Microsoft claims that Microsoft ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.office.word)
  • Re: A place where non-mention of VMS is good !
    ... Microsoft, I have many problems with what they have done to computing. ... community forum site run by two of the principals from Winternals. ... information about the internals of the Windows operating system. ... Microsoft is meeting all standard customer and partner commitments ...
    (comp.os.vms)
Loading