Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000
From: Leo Havmøller (leh_at_nospamrtx.dk)
Date: 03/04/04
- Next message: Francois Piette: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- Previous message: Gary Chanson: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- In reply to: Gary Chanson: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- Next in thread: Gary Chanson: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- Reply: Gary Chanson: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:38:31 +0100
> Fix your program so that it doesn't overflow the message queue. You
can
> either use PeekMessage to pump messages interleaved with whatever
processing
> you're doing or better, use a separate thread for your processing so that
> you can run a normal GetMessage based message pump. Don't tie up your
> message pump thread by doing lengthy processing within message handlers.
>
> -GJC [MS Windows SDK MVP]
Please read the question again. Your answer has nothing to do with the
problem described.
Leo Havmøller.
- Next message: Francois Piette: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- Previous message: Gary Chanson: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- In reply to: Gary Chanson: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- Next in thread: Gary Chanson: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- Reply: Gary Chanson: "Re: Maximum User Handles Per Process Is 10,000 in Windows 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|