Re: frame drop in render filter
- From: rushier <wxiaodong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:24:33 -0800 (PST)
Thanks for the reply.
I set 0 for timestamp in the source filter.
Is it possible that the decoder set some timestamp, and renderer
filter might discard frames based on timestamp?
There should be no CPU problem. If I don't media player, which will
use the same decoder filter and renderer filter, but different source
filter, there was no frame drop.
And the output frame of the decoder should not be too large either.
On Feb 21, 11:40 am, Tim Roberts <t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rushier <wxiaod...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I noticed some frame drops between the decoder filter and the
screen update in my filter graph (the number of decoder outputs is
larger than the number of screen updates.) Can someone help?
I don't know under what situation the render filter will drop
frames. Is it possible that the time stamp set by the decoder are not
good enough?
"Not good enough?" What does that mean?
The renderer drops frame if it believes the time stamp for a frame to be
rendered has already passed. Are your frames large? Is it possible you
are running out of CPU power?
--
Tim Roberts, t...@xxxxxxxxx
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: frame drop in render filter
- From: Tim Roberts
- Re: frame drop in render filter
- From: Chris P.
- Re: frame drop in render filter
- References:
- frame drop in render filter
- From: rushier
- Re: frame drop in render filter
- From: Tim Roberts
- frame drop in render filter
- Prev by Date: Re: Focus of active application is lost! Why?
- Next by Date: How can I run my graph
- Previous by thread: Re: frame drop in render filter
- Next by thread: Re: frame drop in render filter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|