Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: Geraint Davies <geraintd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:04:35 +0100
On 14 Oct 2005 02:01:01 -0700, ngxfer001@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi G,
>
> I am implement the filter following your recommendation. In the mean
> time, I also read all sort of documentation on the topic on H.264. I
> recently come across one documentation mention that the JM software is
> an reference software which come up by 100 proposals from more than 20
> companies. The reference software is therefore very slow and
> inpratical.
>
> If I wrap the JM software and do the experience with the Graphedit to
> play instantaneous video from the webcam, will the JM software
> implementation perform the encoding so slow that the experience will
> fail?? Ot must I trim the software myself to improve the perfromance?
>
> Thank you very much for your advice.
>
> Best Regards
> ngxfer001
The reference software is not optimised for speed. Its emphasis is on
correctness, and you will find that in many cases it is highly inefficient.
If you want speed of encoding and decoding, you will need to do more than
just a little "trimming".
G
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: ngxfer001
- Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- References:
- Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: ngxfer001
- Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: Geraint Davies
- Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: ngxfer001
- Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: Geraint Davies
- Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: ngxfer001
- Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: ngxfer001
- Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: Geraint Davies
- Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- From: ngxfer001
- Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- Prev by Date: Re: Rebuilding WMFDemux.dll [Release] with wmstub.lib and WMF 9.5
- Next by Date: Re: MPEG2 stream parsing with dshow
- Previous by thread: Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- Next by thread: Re: Question on JM H.264 Encoder?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|