Re: Faster than realtime encoding

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: "rep_movsd" <rep.movsd@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 May 2005 05:30:45 -0700

Alessandro Angeli [MVP::DigitalMedia] wrote:
> The WMASFWriter filter and WMWriter object don't seem to
> care about the rate. But the QT runtime used by the source
> filter might since it is meant to be used for real-time
> playback and not editing.
>

Hi

I dont think its to do with QT as I get the input frames individually
without any delay, I can retrieve upto 300 frames in a second from the
QT runtime, I'll try setting the NULL clock and see waht happens.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Faster than realtime encoding
  - From: Alessandro Angeli [MVP::DigitalMedia]

References:
- Faster than realtime encoding
  - From: rep_movsd
- Re: Faster than realtime encoding
  - From: Thore Karlsen [MVP DX]
- Re: Faster than realtime encoding
  - From: Alessandro Angeli [MVP::DigitalMedia]

Prev by Date: Inserting the LTC (Longitudinal Time Code) in a video stream
Next by Date: Re: Enabling DirectX Video Acceleration for ASF file decoding
Previous by thread: Re: Faster than realtime encoding
Next by thread: Re: Faster than realtime encoding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: frame accurate seeking in asf files
... WMWriter object from the WMFSDK outside DirectShow? ... your sink must just write to file the buffers it receives ... If you use the WMASFWriter filter, ...
(microsoft.public.windowsmedia.sdk)
Re: Using ASFwriter to wrap VC-1 elementary streams
... I meant WMVCORE's WMWriter object, ... WMASFWriter filter. ... // Alessandro Angeli ... // mvpnews at riseoftheants dot com ...
(microsoft.public.windowsmedia.sdk)