Re: Faster than realtime encoding

On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:55:58 +0200, "Alessandro Angeli
[MVP::DigitalMedia]" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> If that doesn't work, there may be some limitation in the
>> WMV encoder. I don't have personal experience with this,
>> but I seem to recall seeing that to prevent transcoding,
>> you couldn't do faster than realtime encoding with WMV.
>> I'd love to know if that's the case, so let us know what
>> you find out.

>The WMASFWriter filter and WMWriter object don't seem to
>care about the rate. But the QT runtime used by the source
>filter might since it is meant to be used for real-time
>playback and not editing.

Thanks. This is something I remembered hearing a while back, but I'm not
sure where.

--
New to newsgroups? Read: http://dev.6581.com/newsgroups.html
.