Re: Faster than realtime encoding
- From: "Alessandro Angeli [MVP::DigitalMedia]" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 16:55:58 +0200
Thore Karlsen [MVP DX] wrote:
> If that doesn't work, there may be some limitation in the
> WMV encoder. I don't have personal experience with this,
> but I seem to recall seeing that to prevent transcoding,
> you couldn't do faster than realtime encoding with WMV.
> I'd love to know if that's the case, so let us know what
> you find out.
The WMASFWriter filter and WMWriter object don't seem to
care about the rate. But the QT runtime used by the source
filter might since it is meant to be used for real-time
playback and not editing.
--
// Alessandro Angeli
// MVP :: Digital Media
// a dot angeli at psynet dot net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Faster than realtime encoding
- From: rep_movsd
- Re: Faster than realtime encoding
- From: Thore Karlsen [MVP DX]
- Re: Faster than realtime encoding
- References:
- Faster than realtime encoding
- From: rep_movsd
- Re: Faster than realtime encoding
- From: Thore Karlsen [MVP DX]
- Faster than realtime encoding
- Prev by Date: Re: Faster than realtime encoding
- Next by Date: Re: I can't get the interface of my filter!
- Previous by thread: Re: Faster than realtime encoding
- Next by thread: Re: Faster than realtime encoding
- Index(es):