Re: FileWriter :: Change file wile the graph is running
From: enze (info_at_mpegcodeDOTcom)
Date: 12/28/04
- Next message: The March Hare [MVP]: "Re: FileWriter :: Change file wile the graph is running"
- Previous message: Shea: "Capture Frame Rate Problem"
- In reply to: The March Hare [MVP]: "Re: FileWriter :: Change file wile the graph is running"
- Next in thread: The March Hare [MVP]: "Re: FileWriter :: Change file wile the graph is running"
- Reply: The March Hare [MVP]: "Re: FileWriter :: Change file wile the graph is running"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:38:35 +0100
this is last time i response to your brazen assumptions.
You are not able to stay on soberingly side, allways you switch to
personally
side and also you are abusively.
This is not the way i am habitual to have a dicussion.
>Your credibility is zero as your
> self-proclaimed purpose for being here is to sell your own product
selling this product helped others to solve theire problem, nothing wrong
here.
> Show me the reference to your product in the newsgroups from three years
> ago to substantiate your claim that it was available three years ago for
me
> to download. There is not even a web archive of your site from that time
> period that I could find.
Search this by yourself, you like to know it exact. When i say it is three
years it is the truth.
> What was the date of Thore's inquiry?
ask thore, regardless what i write, you do not belive it.
Or ask Geraint, i found his internet site at that time and asked him by
email
if we could have a business relationship.
> Did Thore use your product? No.
of course not, he did not search such solution. He only wanted to know the
price.
after i told him the price, he acknowledged me that this price is realy good
for such solution.
Nobody has assent that thore would maybe use this product.
What is your intent when asking such senseless questions?
> Nor did you comment on the current wording which still is not clear it is
a
> fully functional product that can be used for free in non-commercial
> applications.
Download it, start it and you will see it works.
All downloadable products on our site including this note:
"demo, for uncommercial use only"
What do you think is the sense of this comment?
For me it says following: If you use it uncommercial, use it as long as you
like!
Is it really neccessary to explain all this word by word?
> > There is no sole complaint from others we pointed to our solution this
way.
>
> That is a blatant lie. Other MVPs have made the same point. And here's
an
> extended quote from a non-MVP on the subject from this newsgroup in case
> you're going to say it's just the MVPs ganging up on you:
I talked about the more than 20 companies we helped with our spilt graph
solution to finish theire development.
Most of them we made first contact in newsgroup, not one of them had a
problem using this way. Not one of them had a problem that this solution is
commercial.
> Is this clear now? Can you give up lying?
no and try to avoid being offend.
> > In the past, when in this newsgroup someone asked about split graph
> > solution, you was not able to help them, is this true or not?
>
> It is not true. I and others have pointed out that a solution for people
> with this problem is to write a split graph filter.
laughable help only to say there is no solution and you have to develope it
by yourself.
>Thore wrote his own
> (didn't use your product) and has regularly recommended people follow his
> example.
never saw this example, where can i download it?
Concluding:
Demonstrable we helped other by pointing them to our "commercial" split
graph solution.
When they posted a question asking about a possibility to start/stop capture
without stop preview, i answered like i do it since a long time.
That our solution is commercial, they do not care a pap for it.
They needed a solution to solve theire problem and we gave them this
solution.
They earned money, we earned money, all are happy - except you of course.
Regardless how often you write you and others (including this MVP's and non
MVP you are referenced to) also was able to help them, you did not.
Show me one post from you where you helped others solving this problem !
Of course, it should be more than simple saying, you have to develope your
own split filter.
The only avaliable solution was this from us !
enze, the bad guy who allways do this terrible advertisement.
"The March Hare [MVP]" <phil@ndsm.maps> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1ggutmq6coyy3$.13e31ibydyr6i.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:20:35 +0100, enze wrote:
>
> >>>If you don't register the bridge filter it crashes (if you actually
build
> >>>the samples it is automatically registered). That's pretty easy to
figure
> >>>out, isn't it?
> > The bridge filter is of course registered, do not think we are
beginners.
>
> The play sample works fine here once the filter is registered (which is
> what this quote is about). The earlier poster who complained about the
> crash in the play sample did not follow up after I pointed out that he
> needed to register the filter. This is often a sign that the problem was
> resolved but I can't say for sure. Your credibility is zero as your
> self-proclaimed purpose for being here is to sell your own product and the
> bridge filter is a free alternative.
>
> > we are all poor silly germans
>
> You clearly missed my point. Others will be able to read between the
lines
> on the full quote you omitted.
>
> BTW, two of my favorite customers are Germans. One visited me at my house
> this year and the other sent me a gift of a Bluetooth snap-in adapter for
> my BMW this year. Don't try to make this about something it isn't.
>
> >>> The earliest newsgroup reference I can find to your site is in April
> > 2003.
> >>> That is not three years.
> > Ask Thore when he first time asked about our DS filters, his inquiry was
the
> > first
> > we had.
> > Maybe you think we are not telling the truth, hope you belief Thore.
>
> Show me the reference to your product in the newsgroups from three years
> ago to substantiate your claim that it was available three years ago for
me
> to download. There is not even a web archive of your site from that time
> period that I could find.
>
> What was the date of Thore's inquiry?
>
> Did Thore use your product? No.
>
> I noticed you did not dispute the lie you were caught in about it being
> marked free for non-commercial use on your site. It wasn't marked this
way
> even as little as a year ago as I substantiated from the web archive. Nor
> did you comment on the current wording which still is not clear it is a
> fully functional product that can be used for free in non-commercial
> applications.
>
> >>> A key difference is that you do it deceptively. Do you understand
that
> >>> yet?
> > There is no sole complaint from others we pointed to our solution this
way.
>
> That is a blatant lie. Other MVPs have made the same point. And here's
an
> extended quote from a non-MVP on the subject from this newsgroup in case
> you're going to say it's just the MVPs ganging up on you:
>
> [QUOTE]
> enze has been reproached before regarding his use of this newsgroup as an
> advertising forum. If you look at his posts over the past year or so in
> Google, you'll see that most of time, he only replies to a person if
> somewhere in his reply he can say "try my commercial solution". Often the
> *only* thing in his reply is "try my commercial solution".
>
> [NOTE] Ironically, you never actually write "try my commerical solution"
> but my posts and those of others made Pete aware that is what you were
> doing.[/NOTE]
>
> Given how many times he's done that, and how few times anyone has come
back
> and said "hey, that worked great", I think Phil's questions are very
> reasonable. It would be nice to know if there's something to enze's
> commercial solution, or if he's just blowing hot air. If he seems a little
> peeved, it's just because this has been an on-going issue with no
> resolution in sight...
>
> Seems to me that if enze were actually helping, rather than selling, he
> would offer the option of providing insight into how his filter works, so
> that people who preferred to write their own could do that rather than
> buying his. The fact that he doesn't is what, to me, makes it clear he's
> more about advertising, and less about helping.
> [/QUOTE]
>
> Is this clear now? Can you give up lying?
>
> Do you see the Moonlight folks here regularly plugging their products?
> Montivision? Leadtools? Mainconcept? Any others at all? Maybe you can
> understand something from that.
>
> > In the past, when in this newsgroup someone asked about split graph
> > solution, you was not able to help them, is this true or not?
>
> It is not true. I and others have pointed out that a solution for people
> with this problem is to write a split graph filter. Thore wrote his own
> (didn't use your product) and has regularly recommended people follow his
> example. I did not need this solution myself so I hadn't written one. It
> is true that you were the only one (deceptively) advertising a product
> here. I have never disputed that.
>
>
> --
> Please read this before replying:
> 1. Learn about newsgroups - http://dev.6581.com/newsgroups.html
> 2. Trim & respond in-line (please don't top post or snip everything)
> 3. Benefit others - follow up if you are helped or you found a solution
- Next message: The March Hare [MVP]: "Re: FileWriter :: Change file wile the graph is running"
- Previous message: Shea: "Capture Frame Rate Problem"
- In reply to: The March Hare [MVP]: "Re: FileWriter :: Change file wile the graph is running"
- Next in thread: The March Hare [MVP]: "Re: FileWriter :: Change file wile the graph is running"
- Reply: The March Hare [MVP]: "Re: FileWriter :: Change file wile the graph is running"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
