Re: Seeking in WMP9&10 ignores DS specs...
From: illiminable (ogg_at_illiminable.com)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Geraint Davies: "Re: Seeking in WMP9&10 ignores DS specs..."
- Previous message: Nick Vosniadis: "Media player Live TV and dvix"
- In reply to: Gabest: "Re: Seeking in WMP9&10 ignores DS specs..."
- Next in thread: Geraint Davies: "Re: Seeking in WMP9&10 ignores DS specs..."
- Reply: Geraint Davies: "Re: Seeking in WMP9&10 ignores DS specs..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 12:10:53 +0800
"Gabest" <gabest@freemail.hu> wrote in message
news:ukCDSUOnEHA.1236@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> It's a commonly known thing that for wmp you have to implement the seeking
> interface on the pins, you should have searched this group or asked at
> least :)
>
Heh ! Maybe to you :-P I'm new at this directshow thing !
Anyway... by the time the seeking issue came up... i'd already been messing
about with my custom transform filter and come to the conclusion that WMP9+
does whatever it likes anyway.
> And yes, having more IMediaSeeking will mean more of the same incoming
> seeking calls. You can only defend against it by inventing tricks, like
> not seeking twice in a very short time, or better, ignoring consecutive
> setposition calls arriving through the same pin (this is what I prefer).
Hmmm... i have a multi output source filter though.. isn't the problem with
ignoring the *pCurrent ... how can you return a modified one unless you let
one of the seeks happen ? Does that just mean i can just return S_OK and do
nothing, instead of E_NOTIMPL.
Thanks,
Zen.
- Next message: Geraint Davies: "Re: Seeking in WMP9&10 ignores DS specs..."
- Previous message: Nick Vosniadis: "Media player Live TV and dvix"
- In reply to: Gabest: "Re: Seeking in WMP9&10 ignores DS specs..."
- Next in thread: Geraint Davies: "Re: Seeking in WMP9&10 ignores DS specs..."
- Reply: Geraint Davies: "Re: Seeking in WMP9&10 ignores DS specs..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|