Re: Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback in NET 2.0



Thanks for the info. After filling out many useless surveys asking me to rate
the direct x beta and connect programs for which I am just trying to sign in
to, I still do not have access to the beta news group server. maybe someday
I'll figure it out. I wish microsoft would make it easier to comminicate with
them. Why don't they just make beta newgroups public. I was able to download
the direct x beta without needing to go through all of this. Sorry just
venting...

Well anyway thanks for the info. I hope Microsoft gets there act together
with all of the SDKs out now it is getting very confusing how to go about
doing things with thier newer SDK's. And if they keep moving things around it
is going to get more confusing. At least media/direct show wise.

Just take a look at all the media sdk's they have now at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/windowsmedia/downloads/default.aspx.

it's making my head spin. They need an SDK to cover what SDK to use for what.

Thanks for the loaderlock link that fixed my problems with debugging :)
I Disabled the loader lock MDA, and it is past december so I guess I'll have
to remember to turn it back on some day further in the future.



"ZMan" wrote:

I don't know if AudioVideoPlayback will be included in MDX 2.0? You should
ask in the beta newsgroups
http://msdn.microsoft.com/directx/beta/default.aspx. However since
DirectSHow has been moved out of DirectX and into the platform SDK I doubt
it.

This mean that yes you will need to continue to reference the 1.1 assembly
alongside the 2.0. However the 1.1 assembly 'should' run just fine with just
the 2.0 framework on the machine. I can't promise that the 1.1 assembly
won't somehow clash with the 2.0 MDX though... if it does you should also
raise that in the beta newsgroup.

LoaderLock: http://www.thezbuffer.com/articles/304.aspx



--
Zman
http://www.thezbuffer.com - News and information for Managed DirectX



"flagrant99" <flagrant99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0F7F0132-CFFF-4ECD-9D3E-1377A6ACDBBD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a NET 1.1 winforms app that uses
Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback.
I am in the process of updating the winforms app to NET 2.0.

I installed December 2005 direct SDK but cannot find
Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback as being supported in the new Managed
Direct X assembly. Will this support be added to NET 2.0? If so where?

Am I supposed to reference Managed Direct X run time 1.1 from a NET
Framework 2.0 Forms app? Will this required both NET Framework 1.1. and
2.0
to be installed on client machine?

Also in debugger this seems to be causing LoaderLock exceptions alot. I
figured this might have something to do with Calling into 1.1 Managed
Direct
X from 2.0 WinForms?

Any Info appreciated.




.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback in NET 2.0
    ... http://www.thezbuffer.com - News and information for Managed DirectX ... I still do not have access to the beta news group server. ... They need an SDK to cover what SDK to use for ... raise that in the beta newsgroup. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.managed)
  • Re: Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback in NET 2.0
    ... http://www.thezbuffer.com - News and information for Managed DirectX ... I still do not have access to the beta news group server. ... They need an SDK to cover what SDK to use for ... ask in the beta newsgroups ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.managed)
  • Re: Now that Visual Studio .NET 2005 is released...
    ... warns against the dangers of using 'Beta' software ... > their mouth and unless an SDK is marked specifically release, ... Adding the SDKs pushed the package beyond ... >>> distribution set. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework)
  • Re: VC++ .net 2005 express beta 2
    ... > Also i notice in the beta 2 express edition you cant change the ... > Also i see the instructions for downloading the windows xp/2003 SDK ... > do managed programs written with 2005 editions defiently require the ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc)
  • Re: Missing Module- URGENT
    ... Are you sure, the October SDK had 2 versions in it one of which is a beta, ... The DX installer needs .Net on it before it will install the assemblies, ... http://www.thezbuffer.com - News and information for Managed DirectX ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.managed)

Loading