Re: Yet another question about Z order - something different
From: Alex (alican1812_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/18/04
- Previous message: Jack Hoxley: "Re: Direct3D Engines"
- In reply to: Phil Taylor: "Re: Yet another question about Z order - something different"
- Next in thread: Jack Hoxley: "Re: Yet another question about Z order - something different"
- Reply: Jack Hoxley: "Re: Yet another question about Z order - something different"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Nov 2004 01:35:44 -0800
Thank you Jack and Phil for the helpful comments.
Now I understand, that I have 3 choices:
1. to modify my legacy code, that, actually, not a big issue, I just
afraid of performance problems, all D3D articles I have read till now
state that lit/transformed/DrawPromotiveUP is the most efficient way
to show 2D pics in the 3D world, and I have up to 10 pretty large pics
per second.
2. to modify my own code to make transition effect working with
lit/transformed vertices. Probably, I am missing something here, but
if the vertex is already lit and transformed, I have no options for
playing with lights and/or projections - how can I do any transform
here ?
3. getting both to generate the same results by Phil's way - here I am
absolutely clueless.
I have some mathematical background, don't afraid of doing some math,
just didn't get a point here - probably lack in my DX knowledge, that
is completely "teaching myself".
Thanks a lot
AC
- Previous message: Jack Hoxley: "Re: Direct3D Engines"
- In reply to: Phil Taylor: "Re: Yet another question about Z order - something different"
- Next in thread: Jack Hoxley: "Re: Yet another question about Z order - something different"
- Reply: Jack Hoxley: "Re: Yet another question about Z order - something different"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|