Re: Characters allowed in short filenames



OK, I think I understand now. A common occurence in open source land is that the source code is the documentation. In the situation here, the source code of the CheckNameLegalDOS8Dot3 API is the documentation of what characters are allowed in short filenames. So, is the source code of CheckNameLegalDOS8Dot3 publicly available?


"Alexander Grigoriev" <alegr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Opw0nnJoIHA.1236@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jumping in late to this.
Have you checked CheckNameLegalDOS8Dot3 ? This must be the function you're looking for.

"Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:uYuYx4BoIHA.1772@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It wasn't intended to be a tirade, just a statement of fact. Mr. Rollins' articles had a different purpose from my needs, and the two do not overlap. I tried to explain to IQDave why the overlap is zero.

Yes I know that the rules are extremely complex, and I was hoping someone could say where to find them.


"m" <m@xxx> wrote in message news:uD9FJg9nIHA.4616@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The short answer is: it depends. The rules for file names, especially short names, are extremely complex and depend on the environment.



BTW: you are not going to get what you want out of this group by tirading like this



"Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:udqEoW2nIHA.4292@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Also by the way, BJ Rollins' articles (at least the ones I saw) don't even attempt to discuss what is valid in any OEM code page in the short name stored on the device. Sometimes they discuss what is valid in one selected ANSI code page in a client application, but don't even attempt to discuss dozens of other valid ANSI code pages.


"Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23NVDwV1nIHA.5096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
BJ Rollins has a great blog with an average proportion of bugs. fatgen103.doc seems to have a slightly below average proportion of bugs, but Windows doesn't completely agree with it. I need the actual correct rules.


"IQDave" <IQDave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5AB0E88D-7FD3-4242-97E2-5E1CC1D808A6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
BJ Rollins seems to have a great handle on this info on his IMTesty Blog. You
might be able to get an answer from him.

IQDave

"Norman Diamond" wrote:

US Windows 98 stored the German lower-case letter ゜ as the Greek lower-case
letter ?. Code page 437 has ?. Halfway OK, US Windows 98 defaults to OEM
code page 437 not 850, and we are halfway towards being able to store ?
(but not ゜).

Now, fatgen103.doc is very clear in prohibiting lower-case letters from
being stored in a short name. So still, how did ? get into a short name?

Does anyone know the real rules on what is allowed in a short name?


"Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e1iF$PrnIHA.2352@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> My partial understanding is that short filenames are stored using > the OEM
> code page of the system default locale at the time that the file > (or
> directory) is created.
>
> For complicated code pages this is pretty simple, for example code > page
> 932
> is both ANSI and OEM, so each ANSI codepoint maps onto the exact > same OEM
> codepoint.
>
> For simple code pages this isn't so simple. For example for > several
> Western
> European languages the default ANSI code page is 1252 but the > default OEM
> code page isn't 1252. I thought I read that the default OEM code > page for
> US Windows would be 437, but experiments indicate otherwise.
>
> As far as I can tell, code page 437 doesn't contain a ゜ > character. So if
> the current default OEM code page is 437 and I create a new file > then the
> short filename cannot contain a ゜.
>
> Code page 850 contains a ゜ character. So if the current default > OEM code
> page is 850 then we are halfway towards allowing a short filename > to
> contain
> a ゜. We shouldn't get more than halfway because lowercase > letters aren't
> allowed in short filenames, but let's proceed.
>
> I installed US Windows 98 in a virtual PC. I left all its > language
> settings
> as defaults; I didn't even install the options for limited amounts > of
> multilingualism. In a command prompt window I tried the MODE CON > command,
> but it gave an error instead of telling what code page it was > using.
>
> I did install the character map utility, and copied a ゜ character > into the
> command prompt. US Windows 98 let me create file S゜T.TXT. Well > this is
> OK
> so far, since long filenames are stored in Unicode.
>
> Oops. The DIR command said that the short filename is also S゜T.TXT. > So
> does this mean that US Windows defaults its OEM code page to 850 > instead
> of
> 437?
>
> The next problem is that fatgen103.doc says that short filenames > are
> always
> converted to uppercase. So how could a short filename be S゜T.TXT > instead
> of
> SSST.TXT? No problem for the long filename to be S゜T.TXT, but > how could
> the
> short filename contain a lowercase letter?
>
> Other letters are going to be more troublesome, and I guess
> ntfsgen103.doc[*] is going to say even less than fatgen103.doc > says, but
> if
> anyone knows the real rules, could someone please say?
>
> [* I assume there's no such document, which is the reason it's not > even
> going to say how to determine what characters are allowed in short > names
> in
> NTFS.]
>










.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Characters allowed in short filenames
    ... I thought I read that the default OEM code ... US Windows would be 437, ... As far as I can tell, code page 437 doesn't contain a ゜ character. ... page is 850 then we are halfway towards allowing a short filename to ...
    (microsoft.public.development.device.drivers)
  • Re: Characters allowed in short filenames
    ... even attempt to discuss what is valid in any OEM code page in the short name stored on the device. ... fatgen103.doc seems to have a slightly below average proportion of bugs, but Windows doesn't completely agree with it. ... > As far as I can tell, code page 437 doesn't contain a ゜ character. ... > page is 850 then we are halfway towards allowing a short filename to ...
    (microsoft.public.development.device.drivers)
  • Re: Characters allowed in short filenames
    ... I thought I read that the default OEM code ... US Windows would be 437, ... As far as I can tell, code page 437 doesn't contain a ß character. ... page is 850 then we are halfway towards allowing a short filename to ...
    (microsoft.public.development.device.drivers)
  • Re: Characters allowed in short filenames
    ... I thought I read that the default OEM code ... US Windows would be 437, ... As far as I can tell, code page 437 doesn't contain a ゜ character. ... short filename cannot contain a ゜. ...
    (microsoft.public.development.device.drivers)
  • Re: Transferring directory structure to Windows
    ... Transferring directory structure to Windows ... Filename collisions are a real threat but it should be ... whether FTP, tar, or whatever, you will only wind up ...
    (AIX-L)

Loading