Re: FS Minifilters to sync with remote server
- From: "Don Burn" <burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:16:49 -0500
Yes if you are just talking about some functions a mini-filter may be
enough. Be aware that the kernel may have a lot operations you will find
you should do, and at some point you may discover that a file system with a
mount as a directory would be better. I've been there and wished I could
start over.
--
Don Burn (MVP, Windows DDK)
Windows 2k/XP/2k3 Filesystem and Driver Consulting
Website: http://www.windrvr.com
Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr
Remove StopSpam to reply
"Holger Grund" <holger.grund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:AF8B160B-4C79-4069-95ED-F2455A9BB132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Don Burn" wrote:
Take a look at the discussion about Feasibility: Virtual drive on thisThanks Don. I actually that thread, but this seems to be overkill for what
newgroup. The Eldos stuff may be ok for you, otherwise this is a huge
project.
I'm trying to do.
Specifically, I'm perfectly happy with a standard file system if I can
just
hook some of the operations. I'm thinking of something similar to the HSM
scenarios the docs talk about. As I understand a minifilter should be good
enough for that purpose.
Am I missing something obvious here?
Thanks
-hg
.
- References:
- FS Minifilters to sync with remote server
- From: Holger Grund
- Re: FS Minifilters to sync with remote server
- From: Don Burn
- FS Minifilters to sync with remote server
- Prev by Date: kmdf: system crash by 1394 isochronous transfer
- Next by Date: power Irp debug help
- Previous by thread: Re: FS Minifilters to sync with remote server
- Next by thread: Re: FS Minifilters to sync with remote server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|