Re: WDF storage driver is a dead-end street
- From: krish <pradeep_bisht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:57:40 -0800 (PST)
Hi Maxim, thank you very much. Do you have any suggestions? I have two
storage devices which I want OS to treat it as one (I have a very good
reason for doing this) and that's why I'm trying to replace the
existing storage stack. I was thinking that since there is not enough
visibility into the ataport driver, I may as well replace the whole
stack using KMDF but you pointed out it's a "dead-end-street". How did
you write storport driver? Is there a sample code/doc available for
the storport? Thank you once again.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WDF storage driver is a dead-end street
- From: Maxim S. Shatskih
- Re: WDF storage driver is a dead-end street
- References:
- WDF storage (IDE) stack;
- From: krish
- Re: WDF storage (IDE) stack;
- From: Don Burn
- WDF storage (IDE) stack;
- Prev by Date: Re: COM_PowerUp & COM_PowerDown APIs
- Next by Date: Re: Does anyone know what this bugcheck is ? WdfDeviceInitSetReque
- Previous by thread: Re: WDF storage (IDE) stack;
- Next by thread: Re: WDF storage driver is a dead-end street
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
