Re: UMDF - Virtual HTTP File System
- From: "Don Burn" <burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:35:18 -0400
<plippard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1186057524.669414.58040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 2, 1:32 am, "Doron Holan [MSFT]" <dor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
how are you planning on exposing the FS? using the OS defined FS APIs?
If
so, you can not write a FS driver usingUMDFat this time.
d
Yes....my intention would have been to use the FS APIs.
Are you suggesting that at some future date UMDF will be an option ?
This has been discussed on beta newsgroups about UMDF. Basically, the
framework is far from capable of supporting a file system since it does not
redirect many requests.
You are going to have to do this in the kernel, with the IFS kit. Look at
the mini-redirector samples and documentation expect this to be a long and
painful development with a schedule of 12 to 18 months.
--
Don Burn (MVP, Windows DDK)
Windows 2k/XP/2k3 Filesystem and Driver Consulting
Website: http://www.windrvr.com
Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr
Remove StopSpam to reply
.
- References:
- UMDF - Virtual HTTP File System
- From: plippard
- Re: UMDF - Virtual HTTP File System
- From: plippard
- UMDF - Virtual HTTP File System
- Prev by Date: Re: UMDF - Virtual HTTP File System
- Next by Date: Re: INVALID_KERNEL_HANDLE when call ZwClose( )
- Previous by thread: Re: UMDF - Virtual HTTP File System
- Next by thread: Re: UMDF - Virtual HTTP File System
- Index(es):