Re: Vista IRP_MN_QUERY_POWER
- From: "Doron Holan [MS]" <doronh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:47:52 -0800
also note this is note entirely new behavior. for instance if the machine is
low on battery, it can send the query, ignore it, and then set in previous
version of the os.
d
--
Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. this alias is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Eliyas Yakub [MSFT]" <eliyasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:ORNVcBgJHHA.1248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No it's not completely useless. If you fail the query-power for a
particular sleep state, the system will try to go to next lighter sleep
state (S3->S2-S1) and will pick the one that's not vetoed by anyone. If
they all get vetoed out then system will pick S3 and power-down anyway by
sending set-power request.
-Eliyas
.
- References:
- Re: Vista IRP_MN_QUERY_POWER
- From: Eliyas Yakub [MSFT]
- Re: Vista IRP_MN_QUERY_POWER
- From: Maxim S. Shatskih
- Re: Vista IRP_MN_QUERY_POWER
- From: Eliyas Yakub [MSFT]
- Re: Vista IRP_MN_QUERY_POWER
- Prev by Date: Re: CreateFile faiedl with correct SymbolicLink
- Next by Date: Re: Mutual exclusion at passive level
- Previous by thread: Re: Vista IRP_MN_QUERY_POWER
- Next by thread: Re: ObReferenceObject while holding a spin lock
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|