Re: (null)
- From: "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:40:51 +0900
"Pavel A." <pavel_a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:02A0F64E-E5A3-4A95-A46F-02FD9BDFD9EE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Norman Diamond" wrote:For the past 30 years or so, when seeing the word "(null)" (without the
........
Then this is an old good tradition.
I have no complaint about the tradition. My question was whether CHKDSK is
conforming to this tradition, or whether CHKDSK did this by coincidence to
give us a scare but is mostly harmless.
If somebody would broke it, this can annoy British users, maybe Japanese
too
;)
But DID someone break it, is the question.
Also, it is forbidden to touch the last bug, it ought to stay there...
Oh yeah, you're right. Which one is last? They all are. No matter which
one you're looking at now, the next one will be next, and the last one was
last.
.
- References:
- (null)
- From: Norman Diamond
- (null)
- Prev by Date: Re: USB Setup process is not consistent
- Next by Date: Re: Reading until no more data is available.
- Previous by thread: (null)
- Next by thread: Re: USB Setup process is not consistent
- Index(es):