Re: Cancel-safe without a thread?
- From: "Calvin Guan" <hguan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:50:56 -0700
<BubbaGump> wrote in message
news:11jpf2p2le3ot57lci8og6gjklt8lcpr2t@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:42:42 -0400, BubbaGump <> wrote:
although I still
find computer science theories like balanced binary trees a bit
mysterious. I get the idea, but the details won't solidify in my mind
to a point where I'm comfortable. So, to a certain degree I trust
some of the idiosyncrasies about algorithms like red-black trees.
True, just like RF/Microwave designer wouldn't challenge the Maxwell's
Equations which has been established by a bunch of super talented scientists
in 20's. DSP algorithm designer wouldn't challenge the Forier-Laplace
Transforms, Z Transform.
Things I don't understand I leave to someone else. Things I do, I
leave to me.
They can't solve the equations in practical cases neither. They don't do
math works by hand even they remember how to. They are developing products
instead of doing academic research.
--
Calvin Guan (DDK MVP)
Sr. Staff Engineer
NetXtreme Vista/Longhorn Server Miniport
Broadcom Corporation
Connecting Everything(r)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cancel-safe without a thread?
- From: Maxim S. Shatskih
- Re: Cancel-safe without a thread?
- References:
- Re: Extra reference?
- From: Don Burn
- Re: Cancel-safe without a thread?
- From: Doron Holan [MS]
- Re: Extra reference?
- Prev by Date: Driver prevent S1 standby but aloow S3 standby ?
- Next by Date: Re: Bug in NTFS - date values are preserved
- Previous by thread: Re: Cancel-safe without a thread?
- Next by thread: Re: Cancel-safe without a thread?
- Index(es):