Re: 25 microseconds?
- From: "Pavel A." <pavel_a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 04:03:35 GMT
"JimE" <JimE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:B1369ED4-2F14-4568-B824-F367EE3DDA4F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
the chip needs it's interrupt cause register
"drained" (read until it indicates no interrupts pending). Yet this just
points out how unrealistic a hard 25 microsecond time limit for the ISR is.
For some devices it's great, but for others it's just crazy.
Well... maybe this gives an idea, what means - hardware is "designed for Windows".
That old rusty serial chip wasn't.
--PA
.
- References:
- Re: 25 microseconds?
- From: Pavel A.
- Re: 25 microseconds?
- From: JimE
- Re: 25 microseconds?
- From: Alexander Grigoriev
- Re: 25 microseconds?
- From: Richard Lee
- Re: 25 microseconds?
- From: JimE
- Re: 25 microseconds?
- From: Mark Roddy
- Re: 25 microseconds?
- From: JimE
- Re: 25 microseconds?
- Prev by Date: Re: Assigning a drive letter to com port
- Next by Date: Re: FSFD CloseHandle Interception
- Previous by thread: Re: 25 microseconds?
- Next by thread: Re: 25 microseconds?
- Index(es):