Re: Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- From: "Calvin Guan" <hguan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:26:07 -0800
Eliyas,
It's still not clear to why AllocateCommonBuffer doesn't work. I have not
read the source code but I expect it calls MACMSC internally and it seems to
be the case:
86343404 82b471b1 nt!MmAllocateContiguousMemorySpecifyCache
86343438 81bcd062 hal!HalAllocateCommonBuffer+0x41
86343460 8aca1fcb ndis!NdisMAllocateSharedMemory+0x142
So what is the difference between allocating throght WDM api and direct
call?
--
Calvin Guan (Windows DDK MVP)
NetXtreme Longhorn Miniport Prime
Broadcom Corp. www.broadcom.com
"Eliyas Yakub [MSFT]" <eliyasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Og1fem1TGHA.4956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The common buffer DMA APIs provided by NT on x86, x64, and ia64 platforms
assume that DMA is coherent with the processor caches. Non-coherent DMA is
something that MS folks have consistently tried to discourage for many
years now. I will get the AllocateCommonBuffer doc fixed to talk about
lack of support for non-coherent DMA.
You can workaround either by calling into Mm directly as you have already
done or use MDLs rather than a common buffer, apply the appropriate
noncached attribute to the pages locked into the MDLs, and then use the
standard non-common buffer based DMA APIs.
Mapping the buffer noncached into user mode might fail because Mm detects
the conflicting cached mapping generated by AllocateCommonBuffer and
rejects the noncached mapping to avoid cache attribute aliasing. I have
seen that failure with ZwMapViewOfSection.
-Eliyas
"Calvin Guan" <hguan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:umpx98wTGHA.4772@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I can't tell why MmAllocateContiguousMemorySpecifyCache works not
AllocateCommonBuffer.
Something I'd check:
1. Did you see the actual DMA write operation on the remote system?
2. What does the TLP attribute look like? Especially the NoSnoop bit?
3. How soon do you read from the host memory after you believe the DMA
write is done? this could be write-posting issue. Do a read from the
device register should flush the post-write data back to the host memory.
interesting issue. good luck,
--
Calvin Guan (Windows DDK MVP)
"smann" <ssm11b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:32565AE2-17A2-4EEF-BDD1-20FD87CFCAC6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I am seeing a cache coherency issue with memory allocated through
AllocateCommonBuffer(..). This issue is occuring with a PCI Experss
driver.
The application I am running is in a dual host enviornment, where each
host
(PC) can directly wirte to each others main memory. This achieved
through a
special feature in the PCIe switch. Through various debugging
techniques I
have verifed that when (local) host correctly writes through the PCIe
switch
to the physical memory of the other (remote) host. Once the data is
written,
the remote host is signaled through the PCIe switch to read new data in
its
buffer. I have also verifed that the data read by the remote
application
from its shared memory buffer, is stale, i.e. cached data.
Through other debugging mechanism I can invalidate the cache on the
remote
host. When I do this the behavior behavior of the remote host is
corrected
and it read the contents of the buffer not its cache.
The driver is using AllocateCommonBuffer from the DMA_OPERATIONS
structrue.
I tried other depricated MmAllocateContiguousMemorySpecifyCache()
function
and the cache coherency issue is resolved.
So I am baffeled, I almost certian I am allocating the buffer correctly
w/
AllocateCommonBuffer(...). Here is a snapshot of what I am doing. In
the
drivet I allocate with the following call:
// Attempt to allocate buffer
pKernelVa =
pdx->pDmaAdapter->DmaOperations->AllocateCommonBuffer(
pdx->pDmaAdapter,
BufferSize,
&BufferLogicalAddress,
bCacheEnabled // Enable Caching for buffer?
);
Here the bCacheEnabled is set to FALSE. Then allocate the MDL with the
following call:
pBufferObj->pMdl =
IoAllocateMdl(
pKernelVa,
BufferSize,
FALSE, // Is this a secondary buffer?
FALSE, // Charge quota?
NULL // No IRP associated with MDL
);
MmBuildMdlForNonPagedPool(
pBufferObj->pMdl
);
Next I am getting the User Virtual Address for the buffer through the
followng call:
pUserVa =
MmMapLockedPagesSpecifyCache(
pBufferObj->pMdl ,
UserMode,
CacheMode, // CacheMode == MmNonCached
NULL,
FALSE,
NormalPagePriority
);
I return the virtual address and the physical addres to the user mode
application. The Physical address of the memory remote host is passed
to
local host and is used for wirting to the remote memory. After the
remote
memory is written, the remote host uses the virtual address to read data
from
the shared buffer.
And as I mentioned the data it reads is the data in it cache even though
the
buffer was allocated with the non-cachable attribute. When I ran
multiple
iterations of writes, I could see the data read by the remote host was
from
one of the previous writes.
If anyone has any idea on why the buffer being cached, I would
appreciate
the response?
--
smann
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- From: Eliyas Yakub [MSFT]
- Re: Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- References:
- Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- From: smann
- Re: Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- From: Calvin Guan
- Re: Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- From: Eliyas Yakub [MSFT]
- Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- Prev by Date: Re: Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- Next by Date: Re: How to open this device!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- Next by thread: Re: Cache coherency issues using AllocateCommonBuffer(..)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading