Re: Digital signature for 32 bits and 64 bits question.
- From: hsphuah@xxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Jan 2006 17:14:32 -0800
Yes, I know. What I am asking whether I should have used
CatalogFile.x86 and CatalogFile.amd64 options or other alternative.
>>From the DDK documentation, there is not SourceDiskFiles.x86 and
SourceDisksFiles.amd64 option but checkinf accepts the syntax. I am not
sure about CatalogFile option. Fyi, I do not have much experience in
device driver development when I took up the device driver ownership.
The earlier developer that worked in this project also does no thave
any clue. If someone knows about the answer, please help me. Thanks.
HS
.
- References:
- Digital signature for 32 bits and 64 bits question.
- From: hsphuah
- Re: Digital signature for 32 bits and 64 bits question.
- From: Mark Roddy
- Digital signature for 32 bits and 64 bits question.
- Prev by Date: Re: How to prevent "New hardware found"-wizard from starting?
- Next by Date: Re: Compiling under ddk 3790
- Previous by thread: Re: Digital signature for 32 bits and 64 bits question.
- Next by thread: Compiling under ddk 3790
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
