Re: Lookaside list or ExAllocatePool/ExFreePool
- From: Mark Roddy <markr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:13:41 -0500
On 16 Jan 2006 05:51:34 -0800, "Bajamani" <bajamani@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Article: http://www.osronline.com/article.cfm?id=172
>says using Lookaside list is no better than just calling
>ExAllocatePool/ExFreePool.
>this article dates back to 31-Oct-02. does it still holds true?
Haven't read the article but my own experience is that for some
drivers, especially ones that do repeated high volume
allocation/deallocation of fixed size objects in multiple threads, the
win from lookaside lists is quite large.
=====================
Mark Roddy DDK MVP
Windows Vista/2003/XP/2000 Consulting
Device and Filesystem Drivers
Hollis Technology Solutions 603-321-1032
www.hollistech.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lookaside list or ExAllocatePool/ExFreePool
- From: Bill McKenzie
- Re: Lookaside list or ExAllocatePool/ExFreePool
- References:
- Lookaside list or ExAllocatePool/ExFreePool
- From: Bajamani
- Lookaside list or ExAllocatePool/ExFreePool
- Prev by Date: Re: Could this cause driver_irql_not_less_or_equal?
- Next by Date: Re: Udp sending performance in Gbit Ethernet
- Previous by thread: Re: Lookaside list or ExAllocatePool/ExFreePool
- Next by thread: Re: Lookaside list or ExAllocatePool/ExFreePool
- Index(es):