Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- From: "Jeff Henkels" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:10:50 -0400
See http://silverstr.ufies.org/lotr0/windbg-vmware.html for using WinDbg
with VMWare.
"Antranik" <Antranik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u0G$LEocFHA.796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks for the advice. I am using a VMware virtual machine as my target.
> I have been punished too often by BSOD for using my host as a target.
>
> Antranik
>
>
> "Don Burn" <burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:5xfse.1175$Gp.822@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Windbg is the supported debugger, it has the disadvantage of requiring
>> two machines. SoftIce will work in a single machine case, but costs as
>> much as the second computer. SoftIce is always behind when it comes to
>> Beta versions of windows so if you are debugging betas forget it. Also,
>> I have had terrible experiences with bugs only occuring with SoftIce.
>>
>> Use Windbg, it has quirks but it works.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Don Burn (MVP, Windows DDK)
>> Windows 2k/XP/2k3 Filesystem and Driver Consulting
>> Remove StopSpam from the email to reply
>>
>>
>> "Antranik" <Antranik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:%23VbpBmncFHA.3808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Which is better for kernel mode driver debugging - Windbg or SoftIce?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- Windbg or SoftIce?
- From: Antranik
- Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- From: Don Burn
- Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- From: Antranik
- Windbg or SoftIce?
- Prev by Date: Re: BDA Driver, How to support MCE?
- Next by Date: Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- Previous by thread: Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- Next by thread: Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
