Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- From: "Antranik" <Antranik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:35:18 +0500
Thanks for the advice. I am using a VMware virtual machine as my target. I
have been punished too often by BSOD for using my host as a target.
Antranik
"Don Burn" <burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5xfse.1175$Gp.822@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Windbg is the supported debugger, it has the disadvantage of requiring two
> machines. SoftIce will work in a single machine case, but costs as much
> as the second computer. SoftIce is always behind when it comes to Beta
> versions of windows so if you are debugging betas forget it. Also, I have
> had terrible experiences with bugs only occuring with SoftIce.
>
> Use Windbg, it has quirks but it works.
>
>
> --
> Don Burn (MVP, Windows DDK)
> Windows 2k/XP/2k3 Filesystem and Driver Consulting
> Remove StopSpam from the email to reply
>
>
> "Antranik" <Antranik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23VbpBmncFHA.3808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Which is better for kernel mode driver debugging - Windbg or SoftIce?
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- From: Jeff Henkels
- Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- References:
- Windbg or SoftIce?
- From: Antranik
- Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- From: Don Burn
- Windbg or SoftIce?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Windows Checked Build necessary for driver debugging?
- Next by Date: Re: Can I Access ISAPNP Configuration Registers?
- Previous by thread: Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- Next by thread: Re: Windbg or SoftIce?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|