Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: "Maxim S. Shatskih" <maxim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 07:04:13 +0400
> > Maybe VT100 is also better then PC? :)
>
> Things don't necessarily always evolve to something better, do they?
Surely I agree :) this is just a matter of taste in fact. For me, VC++ is more
usable then vim - it uses the lesser amount of keystrokes to do the same tasks.
Also I prefer modeless UIs (usability experts too :) )
--
Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation
maxim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.storagecraft.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Vipin
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- References:
- Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Lou Arnold
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Don Burn
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Lou Arnold
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Bruno van Dooren
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Maxim S. Shatskih
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: BobF
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Bruno van Dooren
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: BobF
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Bruno van Dooren
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Maxim S. Shatskih
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Bruno van Dooren
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Ray Trent
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: BobF
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: Maxim S. Shatskih
- Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- From: BobF
- Correct group for WDM development??
- Prev by Date: Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- Next by Date: Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- Previous by thread: Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- Next by thread: Re: Correct group for WDM development??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|