Re: USB camera driver: stream class, AVStream, USBCAMD???
- From: "Julia Cip" <julia_vid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:30:44 -0400
Could we continue the topic about the future of using A USBCAMD-based
driver? I really want to know.
Julia
"Max Paklin" <mpaklin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uYt1hgMVFHA.3532@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Remember that AVStream is based on stream class. Stream-class is not
>> going
>> away. A USBCAMD-based driver very likely has a decade of life left in
>> it.
>
> AVStream isn't based on Stream Class.
> KS is the foundation that all kernel streaming is derived from. AVStream
> is the next gen of original KS 1.0, so you can consider AVStreaming being
> KS 2.0 while Stream Class is small extension built on top of original KS
> 1.0.
>
> -- Max.
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: USB camera driver: stream class, AVStream, USBCAMD???
- From: Max Paklin
- Re: USB camera driver: stream class, AVStream, USBCAMD???
- References:
- USB camera driver: stream class, AVStream, USBCAMD???
- From: Julia Cip
- Re: USB camera driver: stream class, AVStream, USBCAMD???
- From: Tim Roberts
- Re: USB camera driver: stream class, AVStream, USBCAMD???
- From: Max Paklin
- USB camera driver: stream class, AVStream, USBCAMD???
- Prev by Date: Re: does UsbIntel DDK sample apply to USB2.0 camera?
- Next by Date: what information is needed for developing a USB2.0 camera device?
- Previous by thread: Re: USB camera driver: stream class, AVStream, USBCAMD???
- Next by thread: Re: USB camera driver: stream class, AVStream, USBCAMD???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|