Re: Problems wth my own User Mode WDM Audio Driver on Windows 2003
From: Maxim S. Shatskih (maxim_at_storagecraft.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Maxim S. Shatskih: "Re: missing libs in win2003 ddk"
- Previous message: Maxim S. Shatskih: "Re: ClientEventChainedReceive problem in TDI drivers"
- In reply to: Doron Holan [MS]: "Re: Problems wth my own User Mode WDM Audio Driver on Windows 2003"
- Next in thread: Kishore: "Re: Problems wth my own User Mode WDM Audio Driver on Windows 2003"
- Reply: Kishore: "Re: Problems wth my own User Mode WDM Audio Driver on Windows 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:42:54 +0400
More so, I know of RTP receiver (virtual microphone) implementation which
is purely user mode, based on WINMM and works fine. No hooking is used either.
-- Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP StorageCraft Corporation maxim@storagecraft.com http://www.storagecraft.com "Doron Holan [MS]" <doronh@nospam.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:eJGU9ULvEHA.1988@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > just because you are running in kernel mode does not mean that you have > better performance or that your priority is boosted. you may see > improvements by handling i/o completion at dispatch level without having to > wait for the return to passive level, but for what you describe, running > purely in user mode would not have any penalties. > > d > > -- > Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. this alias is for > newsgroup purposes only. > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > "Kishore" <Kishore@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:DE584D0E-E8F1-44BA-ACDD-A93C60166070@microsoft.com... > > Kernel mode gives better performance and real time clock > > > > "Guillaume" wrote: > > > >> Maxim S. Shatskih wrote: > >> >>Would kernel mode provide better performance? Purely academic on my > >> >>part. > >> > > >> > > >> > For audio, this is not a point anyway. The data flow is too small. > >> > >> Is it? Depends. 6 channels of 24-bit audio @192 kHz requires a very > >> steady data flow of about 3.3 MBytes/s. Not huge, but not what I call > >> too small either, considering the data must be provided without any > >> hitch. > >> > >
- Next message: Maxim S. Shatskih: "Re: missing libs in win2003 ddk"
- Previous message: Maxim S. Shatskih: "Re: ClientEventChainedReceive problem in TDI drivers"
- In reply to: Doron Holan [MS]: "Re: Problems wth my own User Mode WDM Audio Driver on Windows 2003"
- Next in thread: Kishore: "Re: Problems wth my own User Mode WDM Audio Driver on Windows 2003"
- Reply: Kishore: "Re: Problems wth my own User Mode WDM Audio Driver on Windows 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|