Very similar.
If you are using SQL Server, you should be able look at the plan generated
in Query Analyser and I think you will find that Method 2/4 is more
efficient than 1.
Issues in SQL7 or 2000 setup? ... I am just trying to put a plan together to see what issues that I might see ... when setting up a new SQL server....RAM?...Prev by Date: ... (microsoft.public.sqlserver.setup)
Re: Slow UPDATE and DELETE on SQL Server 2000 ...databases: one on the new machine and one on the old machine (by the ... The plan from the old machine was more complex and has PARALLELISM ... > wrong with the SQL Server installation and unlikely that there are sub-system ... > linked-server driver parameters are not properly set. ... (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
Re: insert..select ...Parameter sniffing.... > The execution plan is vastly different. ... trigger on the target table. ... >> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP... (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
Re: CONTAINS performance ... That said, and with the query plan, I can start to give you more ... relational join in the context of the free-text optimization,...SQL Server tables. ... (microsoft.public.sqlserver.fulltext)
Re: Coordinating multiple projects ... show when something in another schedule is needed in yours. ... > should not affect any successor until the successor plan is calculated. ... > btw Why insert the additional milestone when the macro could reference the ... Is this a problem with MS-Project or SQL server?... (microsoft.public.project)
