Re: Bugged by an easy problem for someone
- From: "Sean" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:02:38 +0100
"Stephen Howe" <sjhoweATdialDOTpipexDOTcom> wrote in message
news:O7uz$uFzFHA.2516@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Question is why cannot I refer to the field in question useing
>> oData.fields("Products.Name").value?
>
> Because "Products" is the Table Name and I imagine that is stripped as
> part of the name for the field of the Recordset as are all other table
> names.
>
> I wonder if both "Products.Name", "DrinkType.Name" wind up being called
> Name or whether ADO attaches a suffix?
>
> Stephen Howe
>
I also grabbed the field names from the recordset as a test and the field
was correctly named Products.Name.
If I use oData.fields("Name").value it returns the DrinkType and not product
name.
Confused :/
.
- References:
- Bugged by an easy problem for someone
- From: Sean
- Re: Bugged by an easy problem for someone
- From: Stephen Howe
- Bugged by an easy problem for someone
- Prev by Date: Re: Bugged by an easy problem for someone
- Next by Date: Data finding
- Previous by thread: Re: Bugged by an easy problem for someone
- Next by thread: Re: Bugged by an easy problem for someone
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|