Re: ADO recordset problem in recursive routine
- From: Cam <Cam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 05:34:02 -0700
I'm assuming the array is zero based... so use recordcount-1
"Mark" wrote:
> Hello again... Sods law, figured it out straight after making my last post.
>
> Instead of using a second recordset for the children I am using an array
> populated using getrows etc... Wow... I thought the DAO version was fast
> enough, this is much faster :@)
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ADO recordset problem in recursive routine
- From: Stephen Howe
- Re: ADO recordset problem in recursive routine
- From: Mark
- Re: ADO recordset problem in recursive routine
- References:
- ADO recordset problem in recursive routine
- From: Mark
- Re: ADO recordset problem in recursive routine
- From: Mark
- ADO recordset problem in recursive routine
- Prev by Date: Re: One recordset for every table. Is it good practice???
- Next by Date: RE: One recordset for every table. Is it good practice???
- Previous by thread: Re: ADO recordset problem in recursive routine
- Next by thread: Re: ADO recordset problem in recursive routine
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|