client side cursor vs server side cursor regarding memory used
- From: "Jiho Han" <jiho.han@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:27:57 -0400
I have a VB 6 app that imports data from a text data source via JET 4.0 to a
SQL server database.
Although I did not receive the error myself but when my client tested it,
they received a out of memory error. There are about 60K+ rows with 150
columns each of text and numeric values. Obviously, there are checks that
need to be done like, the client system config, etc. I wanted to know
whether using a different type of cursor made any difference in the usage of
memory. I may have some misconceptions regarding client side cursors and
would like to dispel some of it if false. For example, I think that since
the client side cursor keeps track of the cursor on the client side, it'd
retain all the records retrieved so far whereas the server side cursor might
not. Maybe I am confusing it with disconnected recordsets.
Any insights provided in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Jiho
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: client side cursor vs server side cursor regarding memory used
- From: William \(Bill\) Vaughn
- Re: client side cursor vs server side cursor regarding memory used
- From: Stephen Howe
- Re: client side cursor vs server side cursor regarding memory used
- Prev by Date: Syntax error in insert statement?
- Next by Date: Re: client side cursor vs server side cursor regarding memory used
- Previous by thread: Syntax error in insert statement?
- Next by thread: Re: client side cursor vs server side cursor regarding memory used
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|