Re: Timeout on recordset retrieval/Opening recordset passing comma
From: Nikki Locke (NikkiLocke_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/16/04
- Next message: Nikki Locke: "Re: Timeout on recordset retrieval/Opening recordset passing comma"
- Previous message: sven: "Re: ADODB.Stream....gone on client side????"
- In reply to: William \(Bill\) Vaughn: "Re: Timeout on recordset retrieval/Opening recordset passing command C"
- Next in thread: Val Mazur: "Re: Timeout on recordset retrieval/Opening recordset passing command C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:32:01 -0700
Because that part of the application is in C++ already, and is multi-threaded anyway.
-- Nikki Locke (http://www.trumphurst.com/) "William (Bill) Vaughn" wrote: > So why use C++? What benefit do you hope to achieve? Both VB1 and C++ wait > at the same speed.
- Next message: Nikki Locke: "Re: Timeout on recordset retrieval/Opening recordset passing comma"
- Previous message: sven: "Re: ADODB.Stream....gone on client side????"
- In reply to: William \(Bill\) Vaughn: "Re: Timeout on recordset retrieval/Opening recordset passing command C"
- Next in thread: Val Mazur: "Re: Timeout on recordset retrieval/Opening recordset passing command C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|