Re: BatchOptimistic Locking
From: JS (js_at_somewhere.com)
Date: 03/25/04
- Next message: Jerry Pisk: "Re: Stored Procedure return values - Test for DBNull - ASP.NET"
- Previous message: Greg R: "Stored Procedure return values - Test for DBNull - ASP.NET"
- In reply to: Stephen Howe: "Re: BatchOptimistic Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:19:49 +0700
thanks for your response,
but i think adRecDBDeleted is set if we try to delete a record in rs which
is already deleted in the database.
my problem is i have a disconnected rs, thus any changes in database made by
others
is possible and it will not immediately reflected in my rs. so the records
in the rs is
possibly not syncronize with the underlying record in database.
i have tried to call updatebatch to commit my changes (not include delete
action, just
modification of records value) and it will raise an error (as i expected) if
the records
in the database has been changed since it was last read.
the second case is i delete a record in rs, but it does not raise an error
if the records
in the database has been changed since it was last read.
is it the way it work or i have miss something ?
- Next message: Jerry Pisk: "Re: Stored Procedure return values - Test for DBNull - ASP.NET"
- Previous message: Greg R: "Stored Procedure return values - Test for DBNull - ASP.NET"
- In reply to: Stephen Howe: "Re: BatchOptimistic Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|