Re: BatchOptimistic Locking
From: Stephen Howe (stephenPOINThoweATtns-globalPOINTcom)
Date: 03/24/04
- Next message: A. Finkler: "Re: DBNETLIB error with ADO+SQL-Server2000"
- Previous message: Stephen Howe: "Re: DBNETLIB error with ADO+SQL-Server2000"
- In reply to: JS: "BatchOptimistic Locking"
- Next in thread: JS: "Re: BatchOptimistic Locking"
- Reply: JS: "Re: BatchOptimistic Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:25:20 -0000
news:OMrXXxUEEHA.2600@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Does batch optimistic locking does not raise an error
> when we delete data in recordset which the underlying data has been change
> since it was read?
I think it will. If you afterwards iterate over your Recordset, the Status
value of that record will be different. I think the following bit will be
set
adRecDBDeleted for records that are already deleted.
(see http://www.w3schools.com/ado/prop_rs_status.asp)
Stephen Howe
- Next message: A. Finkler: "Re: DBNETLIB error with ADO+SQL-Server2000"
- Previous message: Stephen Howe: "Re: DBNETLIB error with ADO+SQL-Server2000"
- In reply to: JS: "BatchOptimistic Locking"
- Next in thread: JS: "Re: BatchOptimistic Locking"
- Reply: JS: "Re: BatchOptimistic Locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|