BatchOptimistic Locking

From: JS (js_at_somewhere.com)
Date: 03/24/04 

Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:11:16 +0700

Does batch optimistic locking does not raise an error
when we delete data in recordset which the underlying data has been change
since it was read?

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The data has been changed. Another user edited this record and saved the changes before you atte
    ... > when I change field2 on the form, ... Why are you using a separate recordset to update data that is ... already opened in the recordset behind the form you're using to edit ... than the obvious method of changing the form's underlying data, ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Re: The data has been changed. Another user edited this record and saved the changes before you atte
    ... when I change field2 on the form, ... Why are you using a separate recordset to update data that is ... already opened in the recordset behind the form you're using to edit ... than the obvious method of changing the form's underlying data, ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Out-of-process recordset
    ... I have an out-of-process server that implements an object ... with a "Recordset" property, implmented as a read-only IDispatch* property. ... This does not change the field value in the object's underlying recordset. ... controls and the underlying data in never changed. ...
    (microsoft.public.inetsdk.programming.scripting.vbscript)
  • Re: BatchOptimistic Locking
    ... > Does batch optimistic locking does not raise an error ... > when we delete data in recordset which the underlying data has been change ... If you afterwards iterate over your Recordset, ...
    (microsoft.public.data.ado)