Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: "LRM" <Fskspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:08:58 -0600
"Brat®" <likeIwouldtellyou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eS%23c1UzBHHA.4892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All I can say is:
It was his way of saying that he didn't know who she was and why was she
using the binary equivalent for 74. Since he knew of no MCNGP with a
member number that high he was questioning if Brat was even and MCNGP. A
simple error since she hardly ever posts he was not familiar with her. He
was trying to rid the ng of posers.Personally I find his intentions
laudable, even if his delivery was a little unusual. The comment about
women not being able to convert binary was of course incorrect.
LRM
Perhaps but once I clarified the membership (one of the early members at
that), his approach should have changed instead of continuing the attack.
At that point, most honorable members would have backed down and made
light of the scripting error. Once I realized the problem and removed the
faulty script, I fully expected a razing from the group but not a complete
put down for my gender. And his comment about "women not being able to
convert" was again inaccurate for 2 reasons:
1. You picked it up (while I made the mistake of not even looking at the
script output - therein lies my mistake)
2. The script was created by a MALE which I also explained.
But then one has to wonder if, with all the members we do have, what
calibre we have as members where one would continue with such behavior
toward another member. But that is just my opinion. As a member for many
years (my # is 10 so it has been a few - will be 4 years in April I
think), I have seen a lot of things but normally we tend to stick together
as a group. Chalk that up to another mistake on my part.
--
Brat® MCNGP # 10/69
Post more often
I'm very rarely ever wrong
Thor is the god of thunder and isn't ordinary, so expecting an ordinary
response from him as a newer member isn't going to work.
Don't blame your binary problems on men, they can't help it.
.
- References:
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: Phil
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: JaR
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: Phil
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: JaR
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: Phil
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: Neil
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: kpg
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: JaR
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: kpg
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: kpg
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: Jed
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: BratŪ
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: Thor
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: BratŪ
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: kpg
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: LRM
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- From: BratŪ
- Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Monday KMA
- Next by Date: Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- Next by thread: Re: Question about scope of ADI DNS replication
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|