Re: problem
- From: "FrisbeeŽ" <billLASTNAME@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:05:04 -0500
"lostone" <lostone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:p2kRf.27934$ty4.23056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Brainus Deadus,
Hey, that's a good won.
I have read what is transpiring in this post. I believe silly1 had or has
a problem with someone posting some stuff on the web out of this
newsgroup.
What's the problem with that?
What is it to you? He is talking about the physical address not your
internal IP address. You can cross check the physical address and come up
with the actual address of the place/person that posted it.
Huh? You lost me somewhere.
If you did this to harrasss/embaress/humiliate this person then you should
make it right. If you did this from a company and this person can prove
it. Personally, I feel sorry for you and the company as this can cause
serious litigation.
There you go talking about "companies" again. What exactly are you going on
about? Are you sure "lostone" <> "silly1?"
Unless you did it Brainus Deadus you are really stupid for getting
involved.
Now, now. Let's not get personal. I called someone stupid just last week
and I really got a good lecture about it. Now I won't do that anymore.
But then those that are Microsoft Certified do not have to pass a common
sense test.
What is this common sense of which you speak?
I am silly1 and think you all are putzes for thinking otherwise.
IFYPFY
It is none of your business, but then some of the smart alec answers are
funny others not.
Please to be letting us know in the future which poasts are indeed our
business. Thanking you kindly.
Have a good day,
I try, I really do.
Putzes
Well, I wouldn't be that down on yourself.
How about "Putz1"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: problem
- From: kpg
- Re: problem
- References:
- problem
- From: lostone
- problem
- Prev by Date: Re: MCP
- Next by Date: Re: OT: It's 1:44 AM.
- Previous by thread: problem
- Next by thread: Re: problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|