Re: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- From: catwalker63 <_catwalker63_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:31:37 -0500
Patrick Dickey <pd1ckey43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> prattled ceaslessly in
news:uLlkrFFrFHA.4072@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> catwalker63 wrote:
>> Patrick Dickey <pd1ckey43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> prattled ceaslessly in
>> news:eJx3WIArFHA.1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>>
>>>On a side note, I believe I know what "Chalk's Term" is, and I
>>>believe it applies here.
>>
>>
>>
>> Wrong context. You need further study.
>>
> Well, Google wasn't my friend this morning then...lol Every reference
> to Chalk's term referred to posts by MCNGP's talking about it, but no
> one actually defining it..lol I took the context from a few of the
> posts.
>
> Hopefully Google will be my friend tonight.;)
>
Just remember, the whole point of the MCNGP cert is that it requires the
incumbent to be able to research the requirements themselves. It's not
supposed to be easy. <eg>
--
Catwalker
aka Pu$$y Feet
BS, MCP, MCSA, MCSE
MCNGP #43
www.mcngp.com
faq.mcngp.com
"Definitely not wearing any underwear."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- From: Jtyc
- Re: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- References:
- OT: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- From: /* Microcephalic S. Bob [MCNGP #46] */
- Re: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- From: lowdes
- Re: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- From: lowdes
- Re: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- From: catwalker63
- OT: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- Prev by Date: Re: Security+ or 70-216?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- Previous by thread: Re: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- Next by thread: Re: Disbanding the AMCNGP.
- Index(es):