Re: GPO configuration
- From: Ben Smith <benjaminwsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:16:32 -0700
In article <Xns968A8033A4C81catwalker63athotmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
_catwalker63_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> "=?Utf-8?B?V2F5bmU=?=" <Wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> prattled
> ceaslessly in news:50DD62F2-91D2-4E7C-9F97-FF6CF7DDC452@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> > I am still confused on this issue. What if I leave the domain
> > account/password policy undefined and apply different OU
> > account/password policies? It seems like this should work. Also on
> > the issue of overrides - does an account/password policy applied at
> > the domain level override OU level? I thought the lower GPO policies
> > would overwrite the upper levels if the same setting is configured
> > with different parameters. So in my question above the undefined
> > policy would override the defined policy? Do account/password
> > policies always override lower processed GPO policies even if you do
> > not no override in the GPO? Note - these questions apply to 2000
> > arena - 70-217. Thanks
> >
>
> OU Account Policies only affect local SAM accounts for the computer
> accounts in that OU. All domain controllers will get their Account
> Policies (Password Policies, Account Lockout Policies, and Kerberos
> Policies) from the winning domain level policy and nowhere else.
Not quite - the effective settings applied for Account policies are
resolved like they are for any other GPO setting - not at the policy
level, hence there is no "winning policy" per se.
> Also,
> Account Policies are in the computer configuration of group policy and
> therefore would affect computers and not users. Active Directory user
> accounts will be affected by the policy the domain controllers use which
> is always only from the winning domain account policies. Normally, you
> would be correct that the policy closer to the object would win, but this
> is the exception that proves the rule.
>
>
.
- References:
- GPO configuration
- From: Wayne
- Re: GPO configuration
- From: Steven L Umbach
- Re: GPO configuration
- From: Wayne
- Re: GPO configuration
- From: catwalker63
- GPO configuration
- Prev by Date: Re: GPO configuration
- Next by Date: Re: 70-282
- Previous by thread: Re: GPO configuration
- Next by thread: Re: GPO configuration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|