Re: Worthless
From: Angel (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/03/05
- Next message: Fishfood: "Re: Worthless"
- Previous message: FrisbeeŽ: "Re: New name"
- In reply to: JaR: "Re: Worthless"
- Next in thread: The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere: "Re: Worthless"
- Reply: The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere: "Re: Worthless"
- Reply: FrisbeeŽ: "Re: Worthless"
- Reply: Neil: "Re: Worthless"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:34:30 -0800
>-----Original Message-----
>In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Angel climbed on a
soapbox & opined:
>
>> That's absurd.
>> From what you are saying is that you (people here) can
>> answer any questions that not answered on the internet
>> somewhere and have never have been answered.
>
>Huh?
"The quest is not knowing all of the answers, but knowing
how and where
to search for the answers you don't possess.
Now, take the plug out of your sphincter, quit looking
for a handout and learn how to Google."
It's somewhat clear. let me summarize.
Don't ask here go learn to user google and find it.
Is that better?
>
>> As a professional and possibly representing yourself
as a
>> Microsoft Corporation Professional (some way
Certified)
>> you should know better than that.
>
>I know that a professional would not need to ask the
dumb questions we
>are talking about. MCSE is a professional certification
(At least it's
>supposed to be) not a no0b training program. Get it?
I'm not sure that you realize but this group is publicly
accessible and viewed around the world. From what I
understand it is meant for people who are looking into or
are already certified. If it was only for certified
people you would need your mcp to login. Therefore, yes
it is a no0b training program. Get it?
>
>>That statement would
>> make this group totally worthless
>
>Nah, it helps me pass the time when the demons infesting
my servers are
>in abeyance. Certainly not worthless.
I agree it is not worthless there are a lot of people
here that contribute very valuable info here and it is
appreciated, really. This was just a hypothetical
statement.
How ever there are a few that ONLY have smart remaks and
nothing else and are encouraged (I'm not referring to
spammers and dumpers).
>
>>or be only able to
>> answer questions that are answered by actual Microsoft
>> employees that have only inside (non-public)
information.
>
>Huh, again?
Perhaps you need to read it again in the full context.
>
>> Would there be any other answered question here that
is
>> not available anywhere else?
>> I'd like to see that.
>
>You bet. We see them all the time. So would you if you
troubled to lurk a
>bit gefore passing your sage judgement.
> It's truly amazing how much help
>is available in here for someone who has legitimately
tried to research a
It may have appeared that I passed judgement on all here.
For this I apologize. This was not meant to be that way.
This was really meant for the few that are really making
this group look hostile and have no other or very little
input. They are there..
>problem for themselves before letting stupid flow from
their keyboards
>into this group.
This is true we have to deal with a lot of stupid people
and sometimes people who say things before thinking.
(sometimes myself included) But that's life..
>
>--
>JaR
>Thug 10110
>Click on MCNGP.com and see a REALLY useful site!
>.
>
- Next message: Fishfood: "Re: Worthless"
- Previous message: FrisbeeŽ: "Re: New name"
- In reply to: JaR: "Re: Worthless"
- Next in thread: The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere: "Re: Worthless"
- Reply: The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere: "Re: Worthless"
- Reply: FrisbeeŽ: "Re: Worthless"
- Reply: Neil: "Re: Worthless"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
