Re: what is the next best thing to real-exams.net

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Syncme (syncme_at_nojunk.com)
Date: 02/01/05 

Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:41:14 -0500

> I don't feel that it is. There are some people that won't get the hint no
> matter how we phrase it. They're looking for an easy way out, and that's
> that. They won't stop until they get it. Fine, whatever. I'm resigned to
> the
> fact that there are some people that just can't be reached. But for the
> others, the ones who may not know it's wrong (there's a whole other rant
> about how these tools should know it's wrong to begin with, but I'll save
> that for the next paragraph...), but don't want to do things the wrong
> way,
> well, we help them. If it's Chalk's Phrase that does it, great. It's a
> two-fer-one, right there. Nothing's worse than being called an @ssfukcer,
> and if these people realize our frustration and catch our intent, then
> they'll stop. They'll be shamed into not dumping.[1]
>
>> People starting out wont know any better.
>
> Oh dear, here we go. Look, I put the dumpers in two categories: Those that
> know they they're real exam questions, and those that don't. The people
> going to real-exams.net are tools. No ifs, ands, or buts. If you go to a
> site with a name like this, you're obviously looking for actual exam
> questions. You shouldn't need to be told that acquiring actual exam
> questions ahead of time is wrong. In school, did you steal your history
> teacher's exam the day before you were supposed to take it? No, of course
> you didn't. That would be wrong. These clowns are the type of kids who
> did.
> Except this can't be written off as "kids will be kids". This is a
> situation
> where adults are trying to cheat the system, but are too stupid to realize
> that while they may get ahead in the short run, they're screwing EVERYONE
> in
> the long run. Tools.
> The other group, those that *don't* know that TestKings are actual exam
> questions...well, they may or may not be looking for legit study guides.
> If
> they are, then they usually reply with "Oh, sorry, I didn't know! Is Sybex
> any good, then?" Stuff like that. The ones that are looking for cheats,
> well, plain and simple: they're @ssfukcers. If they know that they're
> cheats, why bother to explain that to them again. Just call them a dirty
> name and move on.
>
> If they haven't been
>> monitoring the site they just think it's just a kid with a chip on
>> their shoulder. Telling them the truth, that they are inaccurate, bad
>> information and will mess up your logic, and a waste of money would
>> be a better responce and more will avoid them.
>
> See above.
>
> Like Kline said, you're heart is in the right place here. It's just that
> your method has been tried, but many of us gave up long ago, and resorted
> to
> our current method. You know, I wish we didn't have to set people on the
> right track this way. But it looks like it works better than your way.
> It's
> quite a Macchiavellian thing....the end justifies the means, here. We may
> be
> in the wrong with our comments, but if we can make some people not dump,
> we've done a good thing, right?
>
> If you want to stick to your method, that's fine, and you are to be
> commended for joining the fight. However, should you feel that harsher
> tactics become necessary, please don't hesitate to drop the AF-bomb when
> appropriate. Either way, keep fighting the good fight. :)
>
>
> [1] Note this is only the people who don't want to cheat. Those that do
> want
> to cheat will continue to do so, no matter what we say to them.
>
> --
>
> KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26
>
> Briscobar AT gmail DOT com
>
> Please to be click www.mcngp.com. Rgs!

My thinking is that most mentions of the dumps are from blatant spammers and
they are unlikely to come back to see the comments responded to them so the
$.ss.... comments are useless. However the groups get mirrored to other news
servers and indexed in search engines and viewed by many. The @.ss...
comments may be viewed as frustration at the spam only.(since that's what
those messages are).

Being professionals frequenting this place some must realize, they
must/should not be validated as cheaters or even effective to get the piece
of paper.
Confirming their claims just breeds bad/fake certs. Bad certs hurt all of
us.
Weather they are tools/I0iots/liars/cheaters it doesn't matter, posting some
sort bad reviews... will be far more effective. Instinctively people always
want the easiest way out. They must be taught that there isn't.

A comment attached to it saying that it doesn't work and are incorrect they
are wrong and this ... is the way to do it.... will cut down or eliminate
the demand for it.

At least, people will think twice about wasting time on them.
Not saying the "AF-bomb" from time to time is not tempting.

Syncme

Relevant Pages

  • Re: chinese food and illegal immigration
    ... can cheat at least as well as you. ... It doesn't matter that you REALIZED after the fact that your logic was bad. ... Ok, so not only are you a shithead, but you're a retard. ... I don't attack you for the hell of it. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Jellyfish. Cheating or just Lucky
    ... shapes my opinion about this particular matter. ... incentive to cheat, you have seen many beginner players complain ... about luck and they are always wrong, and you like Jellyfish so ... are leaving the realm of proofs and are back at statistics, ...
    (rec.games.backgammon)
  • Re: Modern Times another Freewheelin
    ... We all know that Mr. Jinx has opinions. ... Or, for that matter, really real, ... Sometimes he turns a phrase (or pulls one ... posts, especially when my point is not being understood or criticized. ...
    (rec.music.dylan)
  • Re: Will and intelligence
    ... I think when I would play before I would tend to ... there was a method for creating a sonata it would be a procedural list that ... learn to make a very good phrase because I can't even make a phrase cadence ... if one has bad notes then it doesn't matter what the overall picture is... ...
    (rec.music.theory)
  • Re: Open: Search does not function in Word 2002
    ... file *.doc for Word documents) and identify the word or phrase you want to ... folder where I need to conduct the search. ... It also doesn't matter if I ... a particular file type or "all." ...
    (microsoft.public.word.docmanagement)