Re: [Media] Commentary: How About a Useful MCSE Certification?

From: kpg (ipost_at_thereforeiam.com)
Date: 12/02/04

  • Next message: Consultant: "Re: [Media] Commentary: How About a Useful MCSE Certification?" 
    Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:17:24 -0600

    "T-Bone" <reply2me@thenewsgroup> wrote in message
    news:%23E89eCL2EHA.3452@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
    > Hopefully someone from MS is actually reading this group.

    <snip>

    Of course, it'd be far
    better if the certification were controlled by an independent
    nonprofit third-party organization, but you can't have everything.

    </snip>

    There in lies the problem. MS wants trainees to see all those (useless)
    MS features so they will use them and enhance MS market position.
    Why would MS promote Norton ghost? When it's good for the
    trainee and good for the consumer but bad for MS? (I know it is
    debatable if it is indeed bad for MS but work with me here) MS has
    a long history of wanting to be the ONLY solution used by its customers.
    And you can't really argue with their success.

    A kinder, friendlier MS? I don't thing so as long as Bill has anything to
    say about it.

    kp "not my real name" g

  • Next message: Consultant: "Re: [Media] Commentary: How About a Useful MCSE Certification?"
    Loading