Re: new mcse 2000
From: catwalker63 (_catwalker63__at_hotmamamail.com)
Date: 10/22/04
- Next message: Ken Briscoe: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Previous message: Consultant: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- In reply to: J.R. Jones: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Next in thread: Neil: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Reply: Neil: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:12:35 -0500
"J.R. Jones" <plente@trilbysofthome.net> prattled ceaslessly in
news:1dssipj0rugjy$.1uqnjsiz9ir8s$.dlg@40tude.net:
>
> Are you arguing or agreeing? Please clarify so we can continue
> appropriately. If we continue on in this vein, I fear readers may
> become confused.
>
> JaR
> Clear Candidate
I'm clear. Does anyone else matter??
-- Catwalker aka Pu$$y Feet BS, MCP MCNGP #43 "Definitely not wearing any underwear."
- Next message: Ken Briscoe: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Previous message: Consultant: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- In reply to: J.R. Jones: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Next in thread: Neil: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Reply: Neil: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|