Re: new mcse 2000
From: J.R. Jones (plente_at_trilbysofthome.net)
Date: 10/22/04
- Next message: Consultant: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Previous message: catwalker63: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- In reply to: catwalker63: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Next in thread: catwalker63: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Reply: catwalker63: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Reply: Ken Briscoe: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:59:32 -0700
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:54:35 -0500, catwalker63 bellowed:
> "J.R. Jones" <plente@trilbysofthome.net> prattled ceaslessly in
> news:1dogephka702x.pa5q5bmxwbsq.dlg@40tude.net:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:26:58 -0500, catwalker63 bellowed:
>>
>>> "J.R. Jones" <plente@trilbysofthome.net> prattled ceaslessly in
>>> news:b5w3id1f94dy.cz2iq2r9my4r$.dlg@40tude.net:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:15:42 -0500, Doom bellowed:
>>>>
>>>>>> I agree except I think you mean cognizant. <eg> Interesting
>>>>>> spelling though.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Spolling Nazi.
>>>>
>>>> No, cognoscente was spelled properly <G>
>>>>
>>>> JaR
>>>> Dilletante Candidate
>>>>
>>>
>>> I suppose if you're an obsolete Italian, you'd be correct. :P
>>
>> Nowhere did I claim it was *used* correctly. Just that he *spelled* it
>> right.
>>
>> JaR
>> Cognocente Candidate
>
> And I didn't say he didn't spell it correctly, just that it was
> interesting. It is actually the correct spelling AND the correct word,
> IF you are an obsolete Italian. :P
Are you arguing or agreeing? Please clarify so we can continue
appropriately. If we continue on in this vein, I fear readers may become
confused.
JaR
Clear Candidate
- Next message: Consultant: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Previous message: catwalker63: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- In reply to: catwalker63: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Next in thread: catwalker63: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Reply: catwalker63: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Reply: Ken Briscoe: "Re: new mcse 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|