More kooky job requirements!

From: no one (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 06/03/04 

Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:14:44 -0700

No...what it means is that the HR people haven't got a
remote clue what a true MCSE stands for. It's just a
buzzword they can throw into their job requirements. I
didn't know that a working knowledge of MCSE meant
anything as far as job experience is concerned. If they
mean they want a working knowledge of, and experience
with full systems engineering including installation,
configuration and administration of a working network,
okay...say so! but don't give me the idea that an HR
person knows what someone with MCSE experience really
is! 'Cause they haven't got a damn clue as to what it
stands for.
>-----Original Message-----
>Yet another bizarro HR world job requirements listing.
These are for a
>network administrator position at a local institution of
higher
>learning:
>
>A degree in computer science or like technology or MIS
and 5 or more
>years of experience in system/network administration. 3
years minimum
>experience on Active directory and 1 year with Citrix.
Working technical
>knowledge of current network hardware, protocols, and
standards,
>including, Microsoft Windows, network routing, security.
MSCE, CCNA, as
>well as Strong interpersonal and analytical skills.
Strong written and
>verbal communication skills are a must, as are
organizational and
>professional skills.
>
>OK, here's why I say this one's a little kooky.
>If you had:
>
>"A degree in computer science or like technology or MIS"
>
>_and_
>
>"5 or more years of experience in system/network
administration"
>
>_aand_
>
>"3 years minimum experience on Active directory and 1
year with Citrix"
>
>_aaand_
>
>"MSCE, CCNA"
>
>wouldn't it fvcking stand to fvcking reason that having
[a]
>
>"Working technical knowledge of current network
hardware, protocols, and
>standards, including, Microsoft Windows, network
routing, security"
>
>WOULD BE A FOREGONE FVCKING CONCLUSION???!!!
>
>A degree, five years experience, and two certs, yet only
a "working"
>knowledge of Windows and networking? Does one achieve
this through
>uber-braindumping? Cash bribes? A career wholly built
on "bopping up?"
>
>Has it just gotten to the point that the HR people are
just goofing on
>us unemployed?
>
>
>--
>http://www.vigo-alessi.com/images/products/1362.jpg
>.
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
    ... exercise of mine is to by pass the security systems in place & prove ... you need anything that needs a reply from the network, ... We do not want the administration to say that " we could have stopped ... enumerate the services, administration subnets, department subnets, ...
    (Pen-Test)
  • Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
    ... exercise of mine is to by pass the security systems in place & prove ... you need anything that needs a reply from the network, ... We do not want the administration to say that " we could have stopped ... enumerate the services, administration subnets, department subnets, ...
    (Pen-Test)
  • Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
    ... exercise of mine is to by pass the security systems in place & prove ... you need anything that needs a reply from the network, ... We do not want the administration to say that " we could have stopped ... enumerate the services, administration subnets, department subnets, ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: Anonymizing Packets yet ensuring 0 % packet loss
    ... exercise of mine is to by pass the security systems in place & prove ... you need anything that needs a reply from the network, ... We do not want the administration to say that " we could have stopped ... enumerate the services, administration subnets, department subnets, ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: The Routing and Remote Access service terminated
    ... > Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE ... > I used to have network before, both wireless and cable, but somehow they disappeared... ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)