Re: MCSE 2000 or 2003
From: e^-i*pi (±1_at_megapathds1.net)
Date: 04/14/04
- Next message: Kat: "Re: Pokeing a snake up my vag*** 9925"
- Previous message: JaR: "Re: Official Letter of Warning"
- In reply to: Leonard M Mack, II: "MCSE 2000 or 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:25:10 -0400
Go 2003. The alternative, getting certified on 2000 first, then upgrading,
would be nice, but hardly worth the time and money. By the time you finish,
you'll only have a short break before the next round of upgrades comes
around (think Longhorn).
"Leonard M Mack, 11" <lmack@usccs.com> wrote in message
news:#ToPwvkIEHA.1944@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> I am sure this has been brought up before, but I wanted to get the latest
on
> what people might think is the best route to go.
>
> I am starting self-study for my MCSE and want to know if people would
> recommend going the 2000 route and then taking the upgrade to the 2003, or
> just going with the 2003 route.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
>
- Next message: Kat: "Re: Pokeing a snake up my vag*** 9925"
- Previous message: JaR: "Re: Official Letter of Warning"
- In reply to: Leonard M Mack, II: "MCSE 2000 or 2003"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
