Re: MCSE 2000 or MCSE 2003 which is simpler to pass
From: Tim Kettring (tim6kettring_at_e-garfield.com)
Date: 04/04/04
- Next message: Rowdy Yates: "Re: LnkWizard TRUTH or FABLE?"
- Previous message: eddierox: "Re: LnkWizard TRUTH or FABLE?"
- In reply to: JB: "MCSE 2000 or MCSE 2003 which is simpler to pass"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 21:45:31 -0500
"JB" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:17e6801c41906$785e7150$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> m in a dilema as to which track to follow. I am very
> well aquainted with Win2000 platform and done most of my
> courses in that. But now I m planning to write the certs
> and am thinking to follow the 2003 track as its the
> latest and I got lot of examprep questions including
> MeasureUp to refer to.
>
> Please help me going in for the better and easier
> JB
>
I asked a question comparing the two . 2k has much more books to learn by ,
2k3 wont be obsolete as near soon . So 2k is easier to learn and pass , but
if you learn 2k3 then you will also know most of 2k . If you just want easy
, then 2k .
I wont pay the $$ for the tests for an op-system that will be obsolete soon
but thats my choice .
- Next message: Rowdy Yates: "Re: LnkWizard TRUTH or FABLE?"
- Previous message: eddierox: "Re: LnkWizard TRUTH or FABLE?"
- In reply to: JB: "MCSE 2000 or MCSE 2003 which is simpler to pass"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
