Re: 2003 Virus and Firewall Protection
From: CEItech (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/29/04
- Next message: The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere: "Re: Is 216 really a monster?"
- Previous message: The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere: "Re: Networking"
- In reply to: Neil: "Re: 2003 Virus and Firewall Protection"
- Next in thread: Neil: "Re: 2003 Virus and Firewall Protection"
- Reply: Neil: "Re: 2003 Virus and Firewall Protection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 07:42:09 -0800
Thanks Neil, I took a look at the PIX. They look good, yet
cost is an importaint factor in buying things. You know
what that is like. I'll have to call or email Cisco to
find out how much they cost. Unfortinatly they don't post
prices. Thanks again Neil.
>-----Original Message-----
>"CEItech" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
news:14d6b01c41539
>$d7d16500$a401280a@phx.gbl:
>
>> I'm in the process of setting up my Server and before I
>> put it on line, any suggestions on what the best Virus
and
>> Firewall Protection is that's out their. I'm short on
>> time, and need some direction on who to get. Thanks.
>>
>
>Hardware firewalls are about it for me. PIX. as for virus
Symantec is what
>we use...
>
>FWIW
>
>--
>Neil
>"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>.
>
- Next message: The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere: "Re: Is 216 really a monster?"
- Previous message: The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere: "Re: Networking"
- In reply to: Neil: "Re: 2003 Virus and Firewall Protection"
- Next in thread: Neil: "Re: 2003 Virus and Firewall Protection"
- Reply: Neil: "Re: 2003 Virus and Firewall Protection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|