Re: 70 305 vs 306
From: Tina (tinamseaburn_at_removespamexcite.com)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Tom Dacon: "Re: 70 305 vs 306"
- Previous message: valko: "MCSD for dummies?"
- In reply to: Tom Dacon: "Re: 70 305 vs 306"
- Next in thread: Tom Dacon: "Re: 70 305 vs 306"
- Reply: Tom Dacon: "Re: 70 305 vs 306"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:28:53 -0700
I guess you haven't had your morning coffe yet :)
T
"Tom Dacon" <tdacon@community.nospam> wrote in message
news:usriTsZnEHA.2612@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
>> thick) and I suspect his 306 book would be the same and have a lot of
>> redundant material such as ADO.
>
> Redundant material??? Surely you don't think that database access is a
> redundant topic for a certification test in Microsoft Windows client
> application development, do you?
>
> Tom Dacon
> Dacon Software Consulting
>
>
- Next message: Tom Dacon: "Re: 70 305 vs 306"
- Previous message: valko: "MCSD for dummies?"
- In reply to: Tom Dacon: "Re: 70 305 vs 306"
- Next in thread: Tom Dacon: "Re: 70 305 vs 306"
- Reply: Tom Dacon: "Re: 70 305 vs 306"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|